Short-range measures of the BCD Healthcare Facility


Order ID 53563633773
Type Essay
Writer Level Masters
Style APA
Sources/References 4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions

Short-range measures of the BCD Healthcare Facility
The BCD Healthcare Facility has various issues that prevent it from running or functioning optimally. These issues or threats can be addressed in different time frames – long-range and short-range. One of the threats likely to attack this healthcare facility is petty theft, whereby employees are likely to steal hospital equipment and tools that may hinder seamless operations. This will consequently lead to waste in time that could have been used to attend to extra patients. Some of the measures that could be used in this case are considered as long-range since they are meant to be in place for as long as the facility is in operation. Others can be classified as short-range, since they will only be used over a short duration and stopped completely, or can be used over a predefined period. The following are some of the short-range measures:

Educate security guards concerning the potential threat of hospital equipment theft.
Integrate an audit process.
Reward departments with the lowest number of losses over a certain period of time, i.e., after a month, quarterly, or yearly.
Check for any discrepancies in inventory to determine whether there is a pattern for occurrences of theft.
The following are some of the long-range measures to curb theft

Install security cameras in rooms where instruments and equipment are stored, as well as the loading dock areas.
Healthcare workers should be encouraged to alert security when they spot someone roaming through the hallways without a badge, or if they lack proper identification or credentials.
Prohibit entry of outside personnel into the medical facility after a certain time.
Always ensure that all supply rooms and cabinets are always locked and that only a few authorized members of staff can access them.
The other threat facing this medical facility is the fact that members of neighboring communities are most likely to visit the hospital, which will lead to overcrowding. Additionally, patients who have slightly higher income levels may opt to visit the hospital since they want to save some money by taking advantage of the hospital’s lower bills. In the end, members of the community whom the BCD Healthcare facility is meant to serve may fail to get the chance they deserve.

To solve this problem, the hospital authority should set aside a week or two, depending on the population of the community, to register members of the community. On these days, members must show proof of residency and must have lived in the area for at least six months. Registration will be ongoing in the later months or years to cater to those who have attained the required six-months’ stay in the area. Some of the important document that may be used by the members of the community when they want to register is rent receipts of the previous six months, including a form filled by their landlords that proves that they live in the area they have specified. Others include water bills, electricity, and gas bills where applicable. The residents will then be given cards, which they will always carry with them during visitation. In case there is an emergency, and the patient did not carry their ID, there will be a list that shows their name along with their social security number.

One of the weaknesses observed in the BCD healthcare facility is the difficulty in making prompt decisions due to complex decision-making processes. This is a rather difficult problem to solve since it is important to have the input of stakeholders and sponsors when making critical decisions. To solve this issue means that compromises have to be made. In this case, sponsors should choose a representative, and the same should be applied to the hospital’s stakeholders. Even though this will limit the amount of control of this parties on the hospital operations, it will help save so much time and allow the facility to run as intended, and in such a way that will not compromise the smoothness of its operations.

Another issue deals with the complex integrated communication channel that follows a rather slow top to bottom approach. This resembles the previous issue only that it talks about the flow of communication. This, again, could be a difficult task to handle, but it could be achieved by making some compromises. The hospital’s junior leaders could be entrusted to make decisions when a solution is required urgently, especially if it involves saving the life of a patient. This could be risky, but it is a necessary step to take. It will, however, not be applied when the situation is not as serious or pressing since the top leaders also need to be made part of the decision-making discussions.

Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization;  and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.


Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!



The post Short-range measures of the BCD Healthcare Facility appeared first on Smart Academic Experts.

Here, you can get a writer to help you with a variety of written assignments. We write essays, research papers, term papers, coursework, article critique, annotated bibliography, reaction paper, research proposal, discussion, and even dissertations. The service is available 24/7 and there are more than 200 essay writers to choose from.

If you are seeking for fast and reliable essay help, you got on the right page. Our essay writing services are quick, discrete and professional and it takes only 5 minutes to place an order! After that, it is all handled for you! Once we have your project specifications, we do all the legwork associated with getting your project done by the best writer possible in the shortest amount of time.

Need a similar solution fast and written from scratch? Place your order now!